The flea market here is as dark and hazy
as an opium den, its flimsy tin roof turning back the midday sun as Edward
Mansa robotically unbundles the shipment of secondhand clothes that has
just arrived.
The dull, red DKNY T-shirt catches his eye. "This," he says
admiringly as he holds the shirt up to the dim light, "is not bad."
He says he can probably get a dollar for it.
The shapeless plaid skirt is another matter, however, as is the dowdy,
ruffled blouse and the banana-yellow sport coat that causes Mansa to shudder.
He'll be lucky to get anything for them, and chances are Mansa will trade
them with other vendors for some cooking oil or dried fish. "You
can't afford to let anything go to waste," he says.
Mansa provides for his wife, mother and baby daughter with the little
money he earns selling hand-me-downs, the old and unwanted clothes that
Canadians, Europeans and Americans donate to groups such as the Salvation
Army or Goodwill. With more donations than they can use, the charities
unload their surplus on wholesalers who buy the clothing in the West for
a few pennies a pound, then ship it here and sell bales of it to Mansa
and other street retailers at a markup of 300 percent to 400 percent.
As Mansa peels an oversize Orlando Magic basketball jersey from one such
bale, his eyes brighten. Even with its curious red smudges and loose threads,
the jersey can go for as much as $3.
"This is a gem," he says. "The young people really love
the clothes they see the American rappers and the athletes wearing, but
everyone -- young and old -- buys their clothes secondhand in Zambia.
It is better-made than what our own clothing industry used to make before
they all closed down, and it's certainly cheaper since it's used clothing.
But is this the way to develop your economy? I don't think so."
This southern African country once had a thriving clothing industry. But
when government officials began opening Zambia's economy to foreign trade
10 years ago in exchange for loans from international donors, tons of
cheap, secondhand clothing began to pour into the country, virtually duty
free.
Not especially efficient, Zambia's textile factories were overmatched
by the wholesalers, who could deliver affordable, passable clothing without
paying production or labor costs or the tariffs that once protected local
manufacturers from foreign competition.
So, Zambia's clothing industry all but vanished. Within eight years,
about 30,000 jobs disappeared, replaced by a loose but crowded network
of roadside and flea-market vendors beckoning shoppers to "rummage
through the pile," or salaula in the language of Zambia's Bemba tribe.
The expansion of global trade following the end of the Cold War has transformed
Africa into a dumping ground for what the industrialized world no longer
needs or wants, a deluge of secondhand clothes, used cars, old furniture
and tools and weapons.
The used clothing shipped to sub-Saharan Africa by the United States
accounts for nearly $60 million in sales annually. The bales of old clothing
that appear on Africa's doorstep are now so familiar entirely new idioms
have been developed. Partly in derision, and partly because many Africans
once assumed the clothing belonged to the recently deceased, Ghanaians
refer to the imports as "dead white man's clothing." Tanzanians
dubbed the garments "dyed in America," and in Zambia the used-clothing
stands are called "bend-down boutiques."
"You can walk for miles at a time here and not see anyone wearing
anything remotely resembling African clothing," said Howard Gatchell,
chairman of the Chamber of Commerce in Zambia's second city, Ndola.
Hoping to undo the damage from decades of colonial rule, and the ruinous
civil wars and socialist economies that often followed, nearly 40 countries
south of the Sahara have over the past two decades adopted the free-market
reforms -- "structural adjustment programs" in development jargon
-- prescribed by such lenders as the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund. But in the generation since independence, sub-Saharan Africa has
never been so poor.
The region accounts for only 2 percent of all international trade, a
share no greater than it was 20 years ago. New international trade rules
developed in the 1990s have since increased world income by nearly $510
billion, according to the World Trade Organization; the World Bank reports
that per capita income in sub-Saharan Africa has continued to fall over
the same period.
Why does the poorest continent continue to get poorer, even as the rest
of the developing world shows at least tentative signs of economic expansion?
The disintegration of Zambia's textiles industry provides some answers.
Since Zambia's leaders embraced free-market policies in the 1990s, the
country's manufacturing base has been eviscerated, leaving the government
buried in more debt than it can repay and gradually replacing a full-time
workforce with a growing informal economy that offers low wages, no benefits
and no job security.
World Bank officials acknowledge that the collapse of Zambia's textile
industry is an unintended and regrettable consequence of the free-market
policies promoted by the organization. And since 1999, the bank has been
working with Zambia and other countries to integrate "poverty reduction
strategies" with their traditional approach.
"International trade is always evolving," said a World Bank
spokesman, Raymond Toye. "And there are all kinds of constraints
to doing business in Africa that maybe we haven't always accounted for.
We want freer and more open trade in Zambia, but the question is: How
do we do that in a way that recognizes and accommodates Zambia's -- Africa's
-- unique history and situation?"
To be sure, war and graft play a role in the inability of Zambia, a landlocked
country of 10 million people, and many of its neighbors to capitalize
on the trade-offs implicit in global trade. But much of the problem lies
in the economies of sub-Saharan Africa. Relative to those of the developed
world, they are still in their infancy, too fragile to withstand foreign
competition for their own turf, too underdeveloped to produce much of
anything the West values, beyond the raw materials that attracted colonial
powers but are worth increasingly less on the world market today.
"We've made the mistake of confusing the free market with development,"
said Fred M'membe, executive editor of the Post, Zambia's only independent
daily newspaper.
"I'm not saying we should isolate ourselves from the world the way
we once did, but we are not looking at how to develop our country. We
are looking at how we can market our country to outsiders so they can
come develop it for us. We are getting back to the same colonial equation
where, in the land of our birth, Africans own nothing, control nothing,
run nothing. We are soon to be aliens in our own country."
Zambia surfaced from 75 years of British commercial and colonial rule
in 1964, inheriting a workforce with fewer than 110 college graduates
and an economy dependent almost solely on mining. Copper, cobalt and zinc
accounted for more than a third of the country's gross domestic product
at independence and 80 percent of its export earnings. The mines employed
-- in one capacity or another -- almost half the workforce. At the same
time, there were no large-scale textile producers in the country.
Using the state as the economy's engine, the "humanist" government
of Kenneth Kaunda, then Zambia's president, nationalized the mines, expanded
the economy's manufacturing and agricultural sectors and walled them off
from foreign competition with import tariffs. To improve the productivity
and skill level of its workforce, the government provided free health
care and primary education.
Literacy levels rose. The economy grew. Within six years of Zambia's independence,
nearly 85 textile manufacturers employed more than 10,000 workers.
Then the bottom fell out. Copper prices plummeted just as world oil prices
climbed, and Kaunda turned to the donor community in 1973.
"We had refused to borrow, but now we had no choice," Kaunda
said in an interview. "I approached both the IMF and the World Bank
and said: Look, we are in this precarious situation. Can we borrow? Their
reply was, well, we think that copper prices will soon rise again, so
please feel free to borrow."
He did, but copper prices continued to plunge.
Weary of the skyrocketing inflation and chronic food and fuel shortages
caused largely by Kaunda's big-government approach, voters in 1991 replaced
him with Frederick Chiluba, a union leader whose Movement for Multiparty
Democracy promised political and macroeconomic reform. What followed was
the continent's -- perhaps the world's -- most dramatic and speedy transition
from a command economy to the free market. Virtually overnight, the Chiluba
government eliminated subsidies to farmers, slashed tariffs on imports,
loosened the state's grip on monetary policy and began to charge "user
fees" for public schools and clinics.
By 2000, Zambia had sold more than 300 state-owned enterprises to private
investors, including virtually all of the state-owned mines. The restructuring
reduced inflation, stabilized spending and increased cash reserves. But
illiteracy and school dropout rates increased. Zambia's debt has reached
$6.6 billion, and the annual payment on the debt is three times what the
government spends on primary education.
Zambia's factories have shed roughly 325,000 of 800,000 manufacturing
jobs since 1990, according to government figures. Chiluba inherited an
economy that included more than 140 textile manufacturing firms when he
took office in 1991. When he left office in January after his second term,
the industry had been whittled to fewer than eight. About 30,000 of the
industry's 34,000 jobs disappeared, according to the Zambia Association
of Manufacturers.
"The pay was not much," said Millie Mansa, Edward's mother.
A 56-year-old widow, she worked at several textile factories in Ndola
and Lusaka until she lost her job five years ago. "But even after
my husband died, I could put food on the table. We were not rich, but
we did not suffer."
Now, she said, "it pains me to see my son go to work every morning
selling these secondhand clothes for sometimes [a few pennies] a day.
Zambia has given up so much to globalization."
Used clothing began to arrive here almost immediately after the government
repealed import taxes in 1992. With no duties charged for used clothes
-- customs officials listed their value at zero -- wholesalers realized
they could create a new market without paying much more than freight costs.
"We started buying secondhand clothes by the truckloads from America
and Canada and Europe," said Jim Ebrahim, managing director of Central
African Traders Ltd. Working with a Canadian cousin, he ships a truckload
of secondhand apparel into Zambia, Congo and Tanzania at least once a
week.
"We pay $35,000 for each container," he said. "When we
first started six years ago, we would clear about $6,000 profit for each
shipment. But now there is so much competition that we only clear about
$2,000 profit on each container."
Zambia's textile producers simply could not compete with the influx of
Western clothes. Even used, most of the clothes were made with superior
machinery and cheap cotton subsidized by Western governments.
"It was stylish. It was cheap. It was better-made," said Mark
O'Donnel, chairman of the Zambia Association of Manufacturers. "Our
industry didn't have a chance. We would have preferred for the changes
to be phased in to allow our textile industry a chance to catch up to
the rest of the world and really compete."
"It's not just clothing," said Ramesh Patel, director of SWAPP
Ltd. Clothing in Ndola, the heart of Zambia's struggling Copperbelt region.
"We used to have factories everywhere, but Ndola is a ghost town
now. We are one of the lucky ones who have managed to survive, but there's
no comparison. We used to supply retailers with 3.5 thousand tons of clothing
annually; we're down to less than 500 tons now. We had 250 employees eight
years ago; we're down to 25 now."
Millie Mansa was one of the workers to lose her job at SWAPP. Unable
to support herself, she moved in with her son and his young family.
Like eight of every 10 Zambians, the family survives on less than $1
a day. Roughly once every six weeks, Edward Mansa and his business partner,
John Sakala, buy a bale of used clothing for $180. With a good bale, they
earn about $240, splitting the profits evenly and reinvesting the remainder
in another bale.
"The key is to get a good bale," Mansa said. "Some wholesalers
will let you inspect the bale first; others won't. We have found that
inspecting beforehand to make sure that you have quality clothes is the
most important aspect in this business."
Millie Mansa has no romantic illusions about Zambia's socialist past,
but the distinction she makes between the past and present is one repeated
across the continent by those old enough to remember.
"Back in the Kaunda era, there was nothing on the shelves but everybody
had a little money in their pocket," she said as she sat cross-legged
in the family's darkened hut on the outskirts of Lusaka. "Now the
shelves are always full and we have things that we never before had in
Zambia. But no one has any money to buy anything."
Many liberal economists and development experts point to the shrinkage
of Zambia's textile industry as evidence of the failure of the "Washington
Consensus," the U.S.-driven policy to spur economic growth in the
developing world through exports. Development leads to expanded trade,
not the other way around, they say.
"Zambia probably has the most liberalized economy in the world,"
said Lebogang Motlana, the U.N. Development Project's deputy representative
here. "But 30 years into our liberation, we don't have the variety
of industries to penetrate other markets, and we were ill-equipped for
such a competitive mode. Maybe the government should have done more to
care for the people and develop industries other than mining, rather than
devoting so much of its resources and energy to free trade."
President Levy Mwanawasa, Chiluba's successor, has pledged to adjust Zambia's
one-size-fits-all macroeconomic approach. His party -- the same Movement
for
Multiparty Democracy that turned to free trade a decade ago -- has introduced
legislation to eliminate user fees, lower costs for government medical
care, restore agricultural subsidies and nourish industries that have
the potential for growth.
Mwanawasa has named his administration's economic program "The New
Deal."
April 25, 2002.
[Source: Washington Post Foreign Service, April 22, 2002] |